Thursday, November 19, 2009

The Future is Now

The Future of Food. Directed by Deborah Koons Garcia.

The Future of Food is a documentary film dealing mainly with the genetic modification of food. It details the science of how dangerous genetically modified foods can be to the plant species. It uses other countries as examples of how genetically modified foods can prevented from being grown and consumed. It also presents an interesting debate about the morality of granting patents for new plant species, which are a form of life.

The intended audience of this film is not as clear as its message. Surely, since we all eat food, there isn't a person who the content of this film doesn't in some way affect. However, not everyone will be drawn to a film about food. People who already buy organic foods will find a confirmation of that decision in this film. In general, people who are conscious about the food they eat will be the main audience of this film.

There are several techniques that the film employs to get its message across. They use interviews with both industry experts and farmers very effectively. The farmers that were profiled had all been part of lawsuits against large corporations for unintentionally using a seed to which they did not own the patent or pay for. The only way in which the corporations were given a voice in this discussion was in short press releases, which were only ever in text form. Even though I agree with the main message of the film, the film only ever presented one side of this debate. I feel like hearing a representative from the Monsanto would have strengthened the film and increased my opposition to genetically modified foods.

In the end however, the film was effective in delivering its message. It ended on a positive note by describing the recent growth of organic foods and farmers markets across the United States. Viewing the film will definitely make me a more conscious shopper the next time I find myself in a grocery store.

Thursday, November 12, 2009

The Umbrella's

If I find myself with absolutely nothing else to do, I may from time to time watch a local news broadcast. When this does occur, KARE 11 (the local Minneapolis syndicate of NBC) is my broadcast of choice. I find their production value of a slightly better quality, even though their content is definitely that of a local news show.

On Tuesday, November 11 I viewed the 10:00 airing of KARE 11 news. The lead story focused on the declining price of dairy products and the impact it is having local farmers. The piece ran almost three minutes and featured many interviews with a farmer struggling to make it on his family farm. The next story centered around a hockey coach (from my hometown in WI!) who had been sexually involved with one of his female players. This story was just under two minutes long. From here, short stories were read by the anchors with a mix of local and national importance. Of the three stories featured, 2 of the three non-local stories had a local connection.

After a commercial break, there was a five minute human interest story about a soldier in the Vietnam war writing letters home to his wife. This story was pure human interest, and repeatedly used the word "emotion." The second half of the show was completed with weather and sports.

The commercials of the show were almost completely geared at the middle-aged, middle class families. Menards, Fleet Farm, Hospitals, and a few car companies all had advertisements. Since this is probably the target audience of the show, this ad strategy makes sense.

Being of generation that gets most of its news online, of the entire 30 minute broadcast, I probably would have viewed 2 stories and possibly the weather had I been on their website. This leads me to my own viewing habits. I do not subscribe to any cable or satellite packages, so I get my TV over the air using a DTV converter box. I watch only a couple of hours of TV/week, with "The Office" being the only program I view on a regular basis. This is aired on NBC, which is owned by General Electric.

My internet is provided by Comcast. The sites I visit most are probably CNN.com (owned by Time Warner) and YouTube, which is to the best of my knowledge still independent(?). I rarely listen to the radio since I have a CD player in my car and can choose my own music. If I do happen upon the radio, 93X(93.7, part of the Disney) and 89.3 The Current (a part of Minnesota Public Radio) are my stations of choice.

I feel that the media that I choose to view is a mix of large, umbrella corporations and more independently minded operations. The type of product you receive from these two sources can vary, especially in terms of content. Umbrella companies' content will often be uncontroversial, but is often entertaining enough to keep some of my attention. Smaller companies and media outlets are more likely to turn me on to something I have not heard of yet. While these media products are not always 100% to my liking, more often than not they are, and I certainly appreciate the effort they make to bring me something new.

Thursday, November 5, 2009

Analyzing Advertising

As I was waiting for a move to begin, I was presented with and advertisement in which a series of very muscular men were hitting each other and yelling in participation for the sporting event in which they were preparing for. Even when the brand logo appeared at the end of the ad I was unsure what they were trying to sell me. The two people I was with were similarly confused, since none of us could properly be considered “athletes.” I viewed another ad from the same company and I am beginning to see the idea. The Air Jordan line of athletic apparel relies heavily on the viewers memory and identification with the basketball great Michael Jordan. Both ads show athletes being passionate and working very hard at their respective sports. They present the idea that Michael Jordan, considered by many to be one of the greatest athletes of all-time, relied heavily on hard work and dedication to achieve such high levels of success. These advertisements don’t explicitly sell shoes, t-shirts, or other apparel. They sell the idea of becoming “legendary” as the ads often end. The Air Jordan brand of athletic apparel identifies with these ethics and can help you along your journey. (View the ad here)



You see online dating services all over the Internet. All these ads do is create a common area where people can communicate. For many people, this is a scary place. You can never really be sure if the person's profile truly reflects who they are. Even sites like Facebook and MySpace can be misleading. This fictitious advertisement that I created targets a niche audience on how they can improve their "coolness." I guess it is a parody of all the online dating services, as well as dieting ads that show radical transformations from geek to chic, or obese to athletic. Here is the ad, made using VoiceThread.